Strip the category name away and it’s simple: someone has to run compliance every week — collect and check evidence, fix what monitoring flags, keep policies and access reviews current, answer auditors and customer questionnaires. A managed compliance service is a standing engagement where an outside team owns that work and answers for the outcome: passed audits, current certifications, and a program that holds up between them.
It differs from a readiness project, which ends the day the consultant hands you a findings deck. It differs from staff augmentation, which rents you a person and leaves the process design to you. The managed model carries the process, the platform expertise, and the execution — continuously, through audit windows and the quiet months between them.
Agency’s version pairs engineers with the GRC platform you already use. Scope covers platform administration, evidence collection and validation, policy lifecycle, onboarding and offboarding workflows, access reviews, vendor risk, security training, questionnaire response, and full audit management — across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and the rest of the framework stack.
On cost: for startups, Agency publishes all-in packages — GRC platform, audit, and penetration test together — at $2,500 to $12,500, against the $25,000–$60,000+ that assembling the same pieces separately typically costs. Larger environments are scoped to stack, framework mix, and audit calendar.
| Option | Who does the recurring work | Where it fits |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance consultant | You do — consultants assess, advise, and hand the list back | Point-in-time needs: scoping, gap assessments, audit-prep coaching |
| MSP / MSSP | They run IT and security infrastructure; compliance evidence, policies, and audits usually stay yours | Day-to-day IT operations, endpoints, and networks — not certification programs |
| GRC software alone | You do — the platform monitors, reminds, and waits | Teams with a genuine internal owner who has real hours for it |
| Managed compliance | The provider — at Agency, engineers and AI operating platform, evidence, policies, and audits | Teams that want the certification outcome without staffing the function |
Agency runs client programs on all four major GRC platforms. Start with yours.
The adoption leader, operated end to end — with partner pricing and a published guarantee on the license itself. Explore managed Vanta.
Deep automation and cross-framework mapping, put to full use by engineers who live in it. Explore managed Drata.
Operations without vendor politics — we run the program and give straight answers on platform fit. Explore managed Secureframe.
Built for the lean teams least likely to have anyone free to run it — so we run it. Explore managed Sprinto.
Sometimes the need is bigger than platform operations. If you want the entire function delivered — strategy, execution, and a bench that doesn’t take PTO all at once — that’s the outsourced compliance team model. If the acute pain is the questionnaire pile blocking deals, security questionnaire services attack exactly that. And when customers want a security leader in the room, a vCISO supplies the title, the judgment, and the accountability.
Still choosing software? The platform comparison hub ranks the major options by company profile — written by the team that operates all of them, which is what keeps it honest.
At Agency: administration of your GRC platform, evidence collection and validation, policy drafting and lifecycle, security training, onboarding, offboarding and access reviews, vendor risk management, customer questionnaire response, and audit management — across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, FedRAMP, CMMC 2.0, ISO 42001, HITRUST, and US data privacy laws. The unit of delivery is an outcome, like a passed audit or a maintained certification, not a block of advisory hours.
Functionally, yes — the market uses both labels for operated compliance programs. “Compliance as a service” leans on the subscription framing, “managed compliance” on the operations framing. The substance to verify under either label is identical: who does the work, who faces the auditor, and what happens between audits. Our full take: compliance as a service.
A single hire gives you one person’s bandwidth and one person’s platform history, plus a key-person risk around vacations and resignations. A managed service fields a team with 500+ programs delivered behind it and AI leverage on the repetitive work. The two aren’t exclusive — plenty of clients add an internal owner later and keep Agency on operations.
No. We operate Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, and Sprinto as they stand — the program improves because operations improve, not because a logo changed. Platform moves come up only at natural decision points like renewals or framework expansions, and the advice stays neutral because we run all of them either way.
Both, deliberately divided. AI handles the repetitive surface: evidence collection, monitoring sweeps, questionnaire first drafts. Our engineers own everything that requires judgment — scoping, remediation, exceptions, auditor conversations. The delivery model is U.S.-based forward-deployed engineers, supercharged by proprietary AI.