Managed Secureframe

Managed Secureframe: operators for the platform you chose

Agency runs compliance programs on Secureframe the same way we run them everywhere else: engineers in your tenant handling evidence, failing tests, policies, access reviews, and the audit. We have no resale relationship with Secureframe — which means when you ask whether to stay or switch, the answer is just the answer.

Assemble Your GRC Team

Last updated July 26, 2026

What managed Secureframe covers

Teams pick Secureframe for solid framework coverage and a reputation for guided onboarding — and then discover what every GRC platform buyer discovers: monitoring is the easy half. The dashboard tells you an access review is overdue; it doesn’t run the review, chase the three managers who ignored it, or explain the stragglers to your auditor. That operating half is what Agency takes over.

Concretely, our engineers work inside your Secureframe tenant on a standing cadence: triaging and fixing failed tests, validating the evidence automation collects, gathering what it can’t, running policy and training cycles, keeping personnel workflows on schedule, and managing the audit from kickoff to signed report. Handing that off adds up to 200+ hours saved per year.

Worth stating plainly: Agency has no commercial relationship with Secureframe. Our reseller partnerships are with Vanta and Drata. If you’re on Secureframe and it fits, that fact costs you nothing — you buy the platform directly, we operate it, and nobody’s margin depends on which logo sits in the corner of your dashboard.

What the engagement includes

The recurring work, owned — with your dashboard as the shared source of truth.

Failed tests worked to zero

Each failing check gets a fix in the underlying system — cloud config, identity, endpoints — or a documented, defensible exception. The list trends down instead of scrolling.

Evidence checked before it matters

Automated artifacts reviewed against what an auditor will actually accept, manual evidence collected on a calendar, and gaps closed months before the audit window instead of during it.

Policies people actually accept

Drafting matched to how you really operate, scheduled reviews, and acceptance campaigns that finish — with the holdouts chased for you.

Access and personnel operations

Onboarding and offboarding checklists, quarterly access reviews, background checks, and training completion, run on schedule and evidenced in the tenant. See policy and access.

The audit itself

Auditor coordination, request lists, evidence delivery, and finding remediation — the audited-compliance grind, handled by people who do it weekly.

Questionnaires on the side

Customer security questionnaires and trust requests answered from your live program — see security questionnaire services — so deals stop waiting on them.

Signs your Secureframe instance needs an operator

Two or more of these usually means the platform is watching a program nobody is running.

Tests have been red for weeks because every fix belongs to an engineer with a full roadmap.
Evidence uploads cluster in the month before the audit instead of spreading across the year.
Access reviews fire when someone remembers, and offboarding lags actual departures.
Policies were accepted once, during rollout, and haven’t been opened since.
Auditor emails sit for days because nobody is sure whose job the answer is.
The admin who configured the tenant has left, and the institutional knowledge left with them.

Stay or migrate: how we actually call it

We operate the four major platforms, so the recommendation follows fit — there’s no quota behind it.

Audit inside six months, platform working fine

Pick: Stay — stabilize and certify

A mid-cycle migration resets monitoring continuity right when you need it most. We run the program where it lives and revisit platform fit at renewal, when switching is cheap.

Multi-framework roadmap coming

Pick: Decide at the next renewal

Platforms differ most in how they reuse controls across frameworks. Before stacking ISO 27001 or HIPAA on top of SOC 2, compare options with real requirements in hand — start at the comparison hub.

Paying for a tenant nobody logs into

Pick: Fix ownership before platform

An unused platform is an operations problem wearing a software costume. Migrating won’t fix it — the new tenant will idle too. Put an operator on the program, then judge the platform on its merits.

Advice without a sales motive

Ask a platform vendor which platform you need and you’ll hear its own name. Ask a reseller and you’ll hear whoever pays best. Agency’s answer comes from operating programs for 1,000+ companies across the four major platforms — rated 4.9/5 on G2 by the people we do it for — and the answer is sometimes “stay right where you are,” because sometimes that’s true.

When we do make a call, the inputs are boring on purpose: your framework roadmap, integration surface, team size, renewal dates, and what your customers’ security teams keep asking for. Platform preference comes last, because a well-operated program passes audits on any of the four major platforms — and a neglected one struggles on all of them.

If migration ever is the right call, in either direction, the durable assets travel: policies, control narratives, risk methodology, vendor records. We run the cutover so evidence history stays audit-usable, and the operated cadence continues on Vanta or Drata without missing a review cycle. The software-versus-service question itself gets a full treatment in Agency vs Secureframe.

Frequently asked questions

Does Agency have a partnership with Secureframe?

No, and we say so on purpose. Agency’s reseller partnerships are with Vanta and Drata; Secureframe we simply operate for clients who chose it. In practice the independence is a feature — platform advice from us carries no commission, and your program gets run well either way.

Will Agency push us to migrate off Secureframe?

Only if the fit is genuinely wrong, and we’ll show our work when we say so. Migration is disruptive enough that the default is to stabilize the program where it lives; replatforming conversations belong at renewals, framework expansions, or funding events — not in month two of an engagement.

What access does Agency need in our tenant?

Scoped administrative access to Secureframe itself, plus limited access to the connected systems we remediate in — granted through your identity provider, logged, and reviewable. You own the tenant and every artifact in it, and access can be revoked in an afternoon without losing any work product.

Can you take over in the middle of an audit?

Yes — mid-audit rescues are a routine engagement shape. We triage the auditor’s open requests first, stabilize evidence collection, and negotiate realistic timelines with the audit team. If you’re already behind on audit evidence, the first week is about stopping the slide, not redesigning the program.

Do you also handle the security questionnaires our customers send?

Yes. Questionnaires draw on the same control set and evidence the program already maintains, so an operated program answers them quickly and consistently. There’s a dedicated security questionnaire service for teams where that’s the sharpest pain.

Frameworks and proof points

SOC 2 ISO 27001 Audited compliance Policy and access Case study: CloudCover

Get operators on your Secureframe program

A working session on your tenant, an honest read on platform fit, and a plan for the next audit — Top-ranked Vanta & Drata partner · 1,000+ companies served since 2021 · 4.9/5 on G2.