Software ate compliance first. Platforms like Vanta and Drata automated the monitoring and the evidence gathering, and the market called it compliance automation. Compliance as a service is the step after that: instead of buying a tool and then staffing the work it surfaces, you subscribe to the outcome. Someone else configures the platform, works the findings, prepares the audit, and answers the buyers — on a recurring basis, for a recurring price.
A note on names, because search blurs them: compliance as a service, CaaS, and managed compliance all describe this same model. Agency’s own term is managed compliance services — everything on this page is that offering, described through the label buyers actually search for.
The test that separates a genuine service from repackaged consulting is simple: after the kickoff deck, who does the work? If the remediation list routes back to your engineers, you bought advice on a payment plan. In a real CaaS engagement the provider’s team executes inside your environment, and your involvement narrows to decisions and approvals.
Four ingredients — platform, people, AI, audit — that usually get bought from four different vendors.
Vanta or Drata at preferred pricing — Agency is a top-ranked Vanta and Drata partner — or the platform you already license. Either way the tenant is yours: your data, your history, our operation.
U.S.-based engineers who connect integrations, remediate failed controls, and build every audit artifact. Operators in your environment, not advisors outside it.
Proprietary AI drafts policies, maps controls across frameworks, and pre-fills recurring answers — speed with human verification on every answer before it ships.
Policy reviews, awareness training, access recertifications, vendor assessments — executed on schedule and evidenced automatically, because skipped small obligations become audit findings.
Auditor selection, request-list management, evidence delivery, and findings remediation, run to a date. The opinion itself stays with an independent audit firm, as it must.
Buyer questionnaires answered from live control data inside the same subscription — the artifact that blocks deals, handled by the people who run the program. See questionnaire services.
The delivery model is a named team on a weekly cadence inside systems you own. Compliance suits a subscription better than a project because it never finishes: SOC 2 renews every year, ISO 27001 runs a three-year certification cycle with surveillance audits between, and buyer security reviews arrive whenever deals do. A project model re-scopes and re-bills at each of those moments; a subscription just keeps operating through them.
Pricing follows the same logic. For startups, Agency publishes all-in packages at $2,500 to $12,500 — platform, audit, penetration test, and the service together — against the $25,000–$60,000+ typical of buying licenses, consultants, and an audit separately. Later-stage engagements are scoped to environment size and framework count, and platform resale at partner pricing is verifiable against the Vanta Best Price Guarantee.
Ask these of anyone selling compliance as a service — including us.
The model fits companies where compliance is mandatory but not a competency to build: startups facing their first SOC 2 under deal pressure, mid-market teams juggling multiple frameworks with a part-time program owner, and any engineering org where the alternative is taxing senior developers with screenshot duty. It also fits framework expansion — the second and third certifications are where single-framework tooling and tribal knowledge break down.
It fits less well when compliance is the business. A late-stage fintech building a dedicated GRC organization, or a company whose regulator demands named internal ownership of every control, should hire — though even those teams often keep a service layer for overflow, questionnaires, and audit-season surge. If you only need operators for a platform you already run, start at outsourced compliance team; if you need executive leadership on top, that’s the vCISO layer.
Functionally yes — CaaS is the category label, managed compliance is what Agency calls its implementation of it. Same model either way: subscription pricing, provider-operated program, outcomes owned end to end. The full service description lives at managed compliance services.
It includes everything around the audit — readiness, evidence, auditor coordination, findings remediation — and startup packages bundle the audit cost. The examination is performed by an independent audit firm, because independence is what makes the report worth anything, and no legitimate provider does both sides.
No — the platform comes through the engagement at partner pricing, backed by the published Best Price Guarantee, or Agency operates the license you already hold. If you’re undecided between platforms, the Vanta vs Drata comparison is written by the team that runs both daily.
Agency runs SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, FedRAMP, CMMC 2.0, ISO 42001, HITRUST, and US data privacy laws — with cross-framework control mapping, so evidence and policies built for one certification carry into the next instead of starting over.
The first deliverable is a baseline: scoped access goes in during week one, and you get an honest read of what’s passing, failing, and missing for your target framework. From there the backlog gets worked in priority order — the cadence is weekly from the start, not after a discovery phase.