Most industries meet security review as a procurement formality. Fintech meets it as an ongoing supervisory relationship. A sponsor bank that embeds your product into money movement answers to its own regulators for your controls — so its third-party risk team reviews you like an extension of the bank, with annual re-reviews, standing document requests, and a file that has to hold up under examination.
That changes what “good” looks like. A questionnaire answered cleverly doesn’t survive this audience; a program that matches its own documentation does. The vCISO’s job in fintech is less about passing a review and more about maintaining a body of evidence — policies with owners and review dates, vendor files, incident runbooks, test results — that reads the same way every time someone with examiner-grade attention opens it.
Agency staffs that job with U.S.-based forward-deployed engineers, supercharged by proprietary AI: a named security officer your bank partner can put in its file, and a team that keeps the file true between reviews.
| Reviewer | What they examine | What the vCISO delivers |
|---|---|---|
| Bank partners | Third-party due diligence: your SOC 2 report, policy set, penetration test results, business continuity plans, vendor inventory, and a named security officer | A maintained diligence packet, annual re-reviews handled as routine, and a security leader on every call |
| Counterparty risk teams | Security questionnaires and evidence requests from enterprise customers, payment networks, and platform partners | Engineering-grade answers backed by current evidence from the operated program |
| State examiners | For money transmitters: the security program as documented, incident history, and how vendors are overseen | Exam-ready documentation that matches how the program actually runs |
| Cyber insurers | Application accuracy and control attestations at binding and at renewal | Answers consistent with operating reality, so coverage holds when it matters |
SOC 2 is the baseline every bank and enterprise counterparty asks about first. PCI DSS enters wherever cardholder data or payment flows touch your systems — and even when a processor holds the card data, partners expect your scoping story documented rather than assumed. ISO 27001 follows for international counterparties, and GDPR wherever EU customer data appears.
Stacked naively, that’s several audits a year, each interrupting the same engineers. Run on one platform with a common control map, each additional framework mostly reuses evidence you already produce — the difference between compliance as a program and compliance as a recurring emergency. Cross-framework complexity hits fintech harder than almost any other vertical, and it’s exactly where an operating team earns its keep.
The recurring request list, maintained continuously instead of assembled under deadline.
In a bank partnership, your vendors become the bank’s fourth parties — so “we use reputable tools” stops being an acceptable answer. Fintech-grade vendor management means a living inventory, risk-tiered review schedules, documented diligence on anything that touches funds or customer data, and offboarding that provably revokes access. It’s unglamorous, it’s recurring, and it’s one of the first files a due-diligence team opens.
The framework-stacking motion fintechs face is the one Coalesce ran with Agency — one framework became four as larger counterparties raised the bar, without the program consuming the engineering team. For the full industry practice, see financial services at Agency.
The recurring core: your SOC 2 report, security policies, penetration testing, vendor management, business continuity, incident response, and who owns security. Expect it at onboarding and again every year — banks re-review you because their examiners re-review them. The packet is never “done”; it’s maintained.
Before diligence opens, ideally the same quarter you start pitching banks. A sponsor bank evaluates the program you have, not the one you describe, and re-papering a thin program mid-diligence stretches the exact timeline you’re trying to compress. The upside: the first packet you build becomes the template every later partner reviews faster.
Yes. What the bank needs is an accountable, qualified person who can answer for the program on calls and in writing — not necessarily a W-2 executive. Agency provides the named leader plus the team that keeps the program worth answering for.
By closing the gap between documentation and reality before an examiner finds it. Examiners test whether the security program you describe is the one you run: policies versus practice, vendor oversight versus vendor list, incident plan versus incident history. Continuous operation — not a pre-exam scramble — is what makes that gap zero.